Study and develop
Readings, videos, educational datasets and exercises that progressively build the case portfolio.
c-ECO / EDUCATION AND CAPACITY TRANSFER
IN DEVELOPMENTc-ECO System Fellowship
Domain · Occurrence
Region · Local setting

An international, fully online program for applying the c-ECO framework and its monitoring procedures to defined cases. A common six-module foundation with domain- and occurrence-specific content and adaptation to each region and local setting.
Proposed organizer: c-ECO Institute
Proposed academic partners: UFAM and Washington University in St. Louis — WashU. Institutional participation and certification have not been agreed.
Explore the Water and Sanitation domain hub in Portuguese →
01 / PURPOSE
The c-ECO System Fellowship in Anticipatory Governance aims to equip students, managers and professionals to apply the framework and its monitoring procedures to defined cases with traceability, supervision and accountability.
The program has a common methodological foundation and six modules. Each applied pathway identifies the relevant domain, occurrence, region and local setting. Participants learn to organize evidence, examine dependencies, assess candidate thresholds and propose governance procedures appropriate to the case.
The first application under development addresses flooding, with a Manaus case presented on a separate page. Other domains and occurrences will require suitable specialist content, instructors and evidence; a general structure does not mean all offerings are already available.
Enrollment does not require an ongoing project: the case may be real or simulated. Completion, optional credentialing, submission authorization and licensing remain separate stages.
This page presents a program under development. Proposed academic partnerships, curriculum and qualification arrangements remain subject to agreement and approval.
02 / ORGANIZATION AND AUDIENCE
The program moves from methodological capability to territorial application. The chosen setting defines the case; it does not restrict where participants come from.
Selected under current c-ECO taxonomy, with cross-domain relationships made explicit.
The problem, its mechanisms and consequences. First proposed application: flooding and urban stormwater flooding.
Environmental, institutional, social and linguistic conditions that shape the application.
The territory, system, assets and sources actually studied, with identified responsibilities and boundaries.
The occurrence does not replace canonical domain classification. A flood can involve several domains and dependency chains. A region may span countries; a local setting may be a catchment, corridor or defined system.
The regional layer records relevant processes, institutions and access rules, available sources, exposure, local knowledge, languages and participation conditions. The local layer specifies the case and its data. Transfer requires checking both rather than automatically copying parameters or thresholds.
The program is intended for participants from different countries who seek to apply anticipatory governance to defined cases. A local case provides a concrete learning setting without requiring participants to live or work there.
| Audience | Potential interest |
|---|---|
| Managers and risk practitioners | Connect evidence, monitoring, responsibilities and decisions in their own contexts. |
| Universities and researchers | Learn and examine the methodology through cases and comparative applications. |
| Service operators and consultancies | Analyze dependencies, disruptions, recovery and decision records. |
| Adaptation and development organizations | Prepare teams for local applications with participation and capacity transfer. |
International flood courses and communities indicate an active learning field. UNESCO offers an English-language course using Mozambique cases, and WMO describes an international community spanning hydrological contexts. These examples support local cases for international audiences, but do not measure demand for c-ECO. [6] [7]
English-language materials support international participation. Additional languages and support arrangements will be specified for each offering.
The regional layer can incorporate findings and lessons from local cases once reviewed and authorized for educational use. Potential outputs include evidence-quality procedures, dependency patterns to investigate, monitoring lessons and adaptation exercises. Any regional reuse must state where the evidence applies and what remains untested.
Manaus may supply this regional learning as its pilot progresses. The site does not currently claim validated regional results or publish the pilot’s datasets. The separate case page explains this route from local study to regional learning.
03 / LEARNING EXPERIENCE
The program combines asynchronous study, synchronous group meetings and individual mentoring. Each format has a distinct purpose and must be included in instructor and participant workloads.
Readings, videos, educational datasets and exercises that progressively build the case portfolio.
Seminars, decision analysis, peer review and tabletop exercises with defined roles.
Support with difficulties, feedback, and verification of each participant’s authorship and reasoning.
Each participant will develop a portfolio on a case approved for educational use. Options include an available educational case, an identified simulated dataset or an authorized participant-provided case. Teamwork must preserve attribution of contributions and individual assessment.
Total learning hours, program duration, number of meetings, mentor-to-participant ratio and maximum cohort size remain to be determined. These should be based on deliverables and the time required for assessment and mentoring before confirming the price and calendar.
04 / PROPOSED CURRICULUM
The sequence moves from defining the case to preparing a territorially adapted application. The syllabi are proposals for joint review.
Competency: define the system, analytical question and territorial relevance of the case.
Content: domain and occurrence characterization; associated mechanisms and processes; exposed populations and assets; interdependent services; land-cover change; risks of irreversibility and limits of inference. Examine ecosystem roles where relevant.
Activity: guided case definition and group discussion of initial hypotheses.
Deliverable: case profile, initial map of actors and services, and record of questions and evidence gaps.
Competency: select relevant framework components and justify their application.
Content: the c-ECO framework and its evidence and dependency structures; methodological consistency; traceability; and the distinction between an analytical relationship and an empirically supported finding.
Activity: reasoned selection of relationships and construction of links to evidence.
Deliverable: methodological application map and traceable record of selected relationships.
Competency: assemble an educational data package with documented provenance, quality and use conditions.
Content: hydrological series; drainage and sanitation; geospatial and socioeconomic data; temporal and spatial resolution; missing data; bias; uncertainty; version and access control.
Activity: critical analysis of an authorized pilot data release or an explicitly identified simulated dataset.
Deliverable: source inventory, data dictionary, and report on quality and limitations.
Competency: propose monitoring and assess candidate criteria without confusing model fitting with demonstrated performance.
Content: case indicators and parameters; candidate thresholds; separation of calibration and testing; reference comparisons; sensitivity and robustness; false alerts, missed events and lead time where measurable.
Activity: retrospective testing or a simulated exercise with explicit records of the data used and held out.
Deliverable: monitoring plan and report on tests, uncertainty and conditions for review.
Competency: connect states and evidence to institutional procedures subject to competent authority.
Content: roles, referral pathways, independent review, conflicts of interest, resources, appeals, data protection and documentation; response conditions and recovery capacity.
Activity: tabletop exercise involving incomplete information, changes of state and review of decisions.
Deliverable: responsibility matrix, referral procedure and reasoned decision record.
Competency: prepare an adaptation proposal distinguishing transferable elements from those requiring new evidence.
Content: territorial comparability; institutional and linguistic suitability; local participation; data, review and maintenance requirements; submission authorization and SIL admission.
Activity: presentation of the final portfolio and an educational defense of methodological choices.
Deliverable: adaptation dossier for a real or simulated local setting within a defined region. The program’s educational defense does not replace the optional credentialing panel.
Analytical relationships and audit requirements guide scientific reasoning. They are not units of enrollment or automatically approved projects.
05 / ACADEMIC QUALITY
The proposed assessment combines module deliverables, feedback and a final portfolio with individually verifiable contributions. Participation in meetings should support learning; completion criteria must require evidence of competency.
| Criterion | What must be demonstrated |
|---|---|
| Definition and relevance | Clearly defined problem, territory, dependencies and boundaries. |
| Evidence and traceability | Identified sources and documented use conditions, quality and gaps. |
| Methodological application | Reasoned choices and consistent use of current c-ECO definitions. |
| Testing and uncertainty | Separation of hypotheses, calibration and validation; recognition of result limitations. |
| Governance and adaptation | Feasible responsibilities and a transfer plan appropriate to the territory. |
A correction and resubmission cycle is proposed, with deadlines, support and records. Minimum scores, weights, attendance requirements, remediation and appeals will be defined in academic regulations. Cohort size must respect mentoring and review capacity.
The regulations should also establish rules for authorship, citation, collaboration and declared use of artificial intelligence tools. The team may verify understanding orally and request records showing how work was developed.
06 / SEPARATE STAGES
Fulfillment of academic requirements. A completion document with a clearly identified issuer and scope.
A dedicated panel for participants seeking a credential. Composition, independence, criteria, validity and appeals require separate regulations.
A separate c-ECO decision under defined requirements and scope of practice. It does not automatically approve submitted proposals.
A separate instrument specifying permissions, use limits, duties and maintenance conditions. It is not presumed to be included in enrollment.
No project or data contribution to SIL, including a replication, enters the Institute without an associated fellow. An associated fellow is necessary but does not replace screening, review, safeguards and approval. Educational exercises remain in the learning environment until any formal submission.
All participants are subject to the applicable assessment, independence and recusal requirements. Scholarships, teaching roles and institutional affiliations do not automatically confer approval or a credential.
07 / APPLICATION CASES
Each case will have its own page, keeping the overall Fellowship independent of a single region.
The first proposed case addresses flooding in the Igarapé do Quarenta. Its page brings together the Amazonian context, the Manaus setting, the scientific themes, data-use conditions and proposed local contributions.
CASE 01 · IN DEVELOPMENTAmazon Region and ManausFlooding · Igarapé do Quarenta →Studying the case does not require living in the region. Applying its findings elsewhere requires adaptation and local validation.
08 / FROM RESEARCH TO TEACHING
Course development may proceed alongside research. Each inclusion of pilot data must depend on an authorized release with provenance, documentation and review. The educational version will be separate from the production environment and datasets reserved for scientific testing.
Simulated data will be visibly identified and accompanied by generation rules and limitations. If real evidence is not ready, simulations may support a preliminary educational version without being presented as real case observations.
Students must not receive reserved datasets in a way that compromises ongoing independent tests. Access to the learning environment does not grant access to operational SIL, partner data or decision-making functions.
09 / PROPOSED ACADEMIC COOPERATION
The proposal combines c-ECO methodological direction, territorial scientific knowledge and educational development. No institutional partnership is confirmed.
c-ECO
INSTITUTE
Coordinate Fellowship design, supply current framework definitions, organize assessment and keep completion, credentialing, submission and licensing processes separate. Responsibilities and approval powers must be established in applicable internal instruments.
UFAM
CCA AND RELEVANT UNITS
Discuss contributions from the pilot’s scientific work areas; review territorial interpretation; develop case studies and prepare instructors, subject to availability and approval. Investigate a university extension arrangement with the competent bodies, supported by a work plan and specific institutional instrument.
Any university extension arrangement and related institutional responsibilities will be defined through the competent university procedures.
WashU
UNIT TO BE DETERMINED
Explore curriculum review, case-based learning, mentoring, assessment and instructor development. The Sustainability Exchange is a reference for team learning with clients and faculty advisors; participation in an international online format is unconfirmed.
CAPS describes customized professional development programs and non-credit certificates. This is a potential discussion pathway, not a commitment to deliver or certify the Fellowship or endorse c-ECO.
The program name remains c-ECO System Fellowship in Anticipatory Governance. Partner institutions and units may appear below the title with authorized roles and logos. An individual faculty contribution or memorandum of understanding will not be treated as institutional certification.
10 / ACCOUNTABILITY AND INDEPENDENCE
The proposed arrangement includes academic coordination responsible for curriculum, mentoring and records; scientific leads for specialist content; and eligible assessors for decisions requiring independence. Composition, appointments and powers will depend on approved instruments.
| Activity | Responsibility to be agreed | Required control |
|---|---|---|
| Curriculum and materials | c-ECO coordination and designated academic collaborators. | Scientific and educational review with recorded versions. |
| Mentoring and teaching | Contracted or formally designated instructors. | Defined scope, workload and disclosed conflicts of interest. |
| Learning assessment | Designated academic assessors. | Rubric, verifiable authorship and an appeals process. |
| Credentialing | Panel appointed under separate regulations. | Independence, recusal and documented decisions. |
| Project admission to SIL | Competent c-ECO bodies. | Associated fellow, screening and applicable approvals. |
| Operational response | Institutions with authority over the territory and services. | The course and simulations confer no operational authority. |
Financial, professional, institutional, family and intellectual property interests must be disclosed and handled by a body without the conflict. An interested person does not decide their own recusal. Appeals and complaints require a defined recipient, deadline and procedure.
Instructors may contribute content without automatically becoming authorized fellows. Projects and data intended for the Institute, including those arising from educational activities, remain subject to the associated-fellow requirement and applicable controls.
11 / INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY
Before joint production, agreements must identify preexisting materials, authorship and ownership of new content, permissions for educational use, translations, adaptations, updates and reuse after funding ends.
Use of the framework and educational materials is subject to the applicable rights and permissions. This proposal transfers no rights and does not replace license agreements. Partner and instructor contributions require their own terms.
Educational access does not transfer data ownership. Use and publication conditions for participant work must be agreed, protecting third parties and recognizing authorship.
Certificates must identify their issuer and the nature of the program. Joint issuance, academic recognition, brand use or future exploitation of funded materials requires approval and compliance with relevant contractual conditions. Academic credits, degree equivalence and professional authorization must not be inferred.
12 / TRANSFER AND ADAPTATION
The common pathway can support applications in different regions. Scientific and institutional suitability must be established for each combination of domain, occurrence, region and local setting.
| Reusable foundation | What the case must define |
|---|---|
| Six modules and general assessment criteria. | Specialist content, participant profiles and support needs. |
| Evidence and documentation procedures. | Sources, quality, access, resolution and local knowledge. |
| Dependency analysis. | Domains, nodes, services and mechanisms relevant to the occurrence. |
| Testing and review procedures. | Events, held-out data, reference comparisons, parameters and validity limits. |
| Governance and traceability principles. | Authorities, institutions, data rules and response capacity. |
Transferability is a design objective, not demonstrated universal validity. Even within flooding, riverine, pluvial and coastal processes may require different variables, models and responses.
Every replication submitted to the Institute must identify the domain, occurrence, region, local setting, associated fellow, responsible parties, evidence, adaptations, safeguards, and validation and maintenance plan. The final exercise may prepare this proposal without automatically becoming an admitted project.
Instructor development will be a specific activity involving supervised practice and assessment of mentoring and evaluation capabilities. Completion does not automatically qualify participants to teach.
13 / DEVELOPMENT AND APPROVAL
The general Fellowship will be developed through readiness milestones. Each case will have its own timeline consistent with funding, institutional agreements and evidence availability. Cohort duration will reflect learning and mentoring needs rather than the full research timeline of a case.
Define competencies, six modules, rubrics, workload and qualification stages. Approval criterion: reviewed design and defined responsibilities.
Identify domain, occurrence, region and local setting; authorize data and develop activities. Approval criterion: traceable, suitable and reviewed materials.
Run a supported offering with assessment. Approval criterion: documented evidence of learning, quality and workload.
Revise materials, prepare instructors and consolidate adaptation requirements. Approval criterion: revised version and confirmed support capacity.
Academic plan and regulations; six common modules with relevant specialist content; materials for each case; assessed portfolios; instructor and adaptation guide; and a report on learning, inclusion and observed costs. Dates and enrollment targets depend on capacity planning and approval.
14 / PARTICIPATION
The program combines independent study, group learning and individual mentoring. The duration, learning hours, cohort size, language and participation terms will be specified for each offering before enrollment opens.
Scholarship opportunities may be established for particular offerings. Selection terms will be published when available. A scholarship supports access to learning and does not guarantee completion, a credential, submission authorization or a license.
Technical work, instructor development and participation as a learner are different roles. Their conditions will be defined in the relevant arrangements.
15 / ECOSYSTEMS AND ADAPTATION
Where relevant to the case, learning may examine how ecosystem functions contribute to reducing vulnerability and supporting recovery. In flood applications, this may include riparian conditions and their relationships with exposure, infrastructure and territorial decisions.
Addressing flooding alone does not establish that an application is ecosystem-based adaptation. The relationship must be demonstrated through the case objectives, evidence and expected benefits. Simulations and proposed interventions must remain distinct from observed effectiveness.
16 / PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT
Each offering will identify its domain, occurrence, regional context and local case. Participants will be informed of learning objectives, language, workload, meeting arrangements, assessment and completion requirements before enrolling.
The program is under development. The current site presents its educational concept and proposed applications. Enrollment dates and confirmed institutional roles will be announced when established.
PUBLIC LEARNING RESOURCES
These independent resources provide background on the subjects addressed by the program. They do not establish a partnership with or endorsement of c-ECO.
c-ECO Institute · Program under development · Proposed academic collaboration remains subject to institutional agreement.
SIL · 19 DOMAINS
Explore the complete English libraries for all 19 domains: nine parts, 35 sections, scientific references, documented cases and evidence matrices.